ASH Clinical News ACN_3.13_FULL_ISSUE_DIGITAL | Page 12

Dr . Battinelli ’ s response :
Each month in “ You Make the Call ,” we ’ ll pick a challenging clinical question submitted through ASH ’ s Consult a Colleague program and post the expert ’ s response , but we also want to know what you would do . Send in your responses to next month ’ s clinical dilemma and see how your answer matches up to the experts ’ in the next print issue .
This month , Beth Battinelli , MD , PhD , discusses thrombosis development after extended travel .
Clinical Dilemma :
A healthy 42-year-old woman not on estrogen flew 2.5 hours to North Carolina – plus time spent sitting in the terminal . She flew home two days later . The next morning she drove 2.5 hours to her sister ’ s home and returned home the following morning . Three days later she was diagnosed with a lower extremity deep vein thrombosis ( DVT ). Would you consider her DVT provoked or unprovoked ? Would three months of anticoagulation be okay , or does she need D-dimers to help decide ? If you consider her DVT to be unprovoked , how long should she be anticoagulated ?
Elisabeth M . Battinelli , MD , PhD Associate Physician , Brigham and Women ’ s Hospital Assistant Professor of Medicine , Harvard Medical School Boston , Massachusetts
Although we usually think of air travel as associated with thrombosis , this complication can occur with extended travel by other modes of transportation , including car , bus , or train . Each year , more than 300 million people travel long distances by air ( defined as greater than 4 hours in the air ). One serious adverse event that occurs for some longdistance travelers is the development of a venous thromboembolic event ( VTE ). Based on observational studies , an estimated one in 500 individuals ( ≥50 years old ) who fly long distances will develop a VTE . A recent study suggested that the risk is cumulative for each two hours of prolonged air travel culminating in a risk of 18 percent . Other risk factors can clearly affect overall risk , including previous VTE , thrombophilia , obesity , hormone-based therapies , recent surgery , or active malignancy . Although The overall risk was highest in the first week after traveling . evidence suggests that the risk of venous thrombosis Risk of thrombosis in individuals traveling by car , bus , or increases after air travel , questions remain about the train was influenced by other risk factors such as thrombophilia , obesity , or the use of hormone therapies . underlying mechanism , as well as whether the mode of transportation is significant .
In the case in question , the patient had cumulative It is also clear that the risk does not end with the travel of 10 hours over the course of a few days . Based cessation of travel . Studies report that increased risk of on the studies previously mentioned , this would suggest VTE persists for the first two weeks after initiation of that the car travel was a provoking factor increasing her travel . MacCallum and colleagues carried out a casecontrol study , which included 550 VTE cases identified months of anticoagulation . The patient may have other
risk of VTE . I would follow current guidelines for three
from practice records . Compared with patients who had risk factors such as obesity , recent surgical intervention , no recent history of travel , the risk to those who had a or malignancy that could increase her risk of VTE going cumulative flying time of greater than 12 hours in the forward and dictate a longer course of antithrombotic previous four weeks was associated with a three-fold therapy . increased risk of VTE . In addition , those who had a
REFERENCES single leg of travel greater than four hours had a two-fold increased risk . 1 This would suggest that cumulative travel 1 . MacCallum PK , Ashby D , Hennessy EM , et al . Cumulative flying time and risk of venous thromboembolism . Br J Haematol . 2011 ; 155:613-9 . over a period of days to weeks can increase an individual ’ s
2 . Tsoran I , Saharov G , Brenner B , et al . Prolonged travel and venous thromboembolism findings overall thrombotic risk . from the RIETE registry . Thromb Res . 2010 ; 126:287-91 . In the RIETE registry ( Registro Infomatizado de
3 . Cannegieter SC , Doggen CJ , van Houwelingen HC , et al . Travel-related venous thrombosis : results Enfermedad ThromboEmbolica ), the authors assessed from a large population-based case control study ( MEGA study ). PLoS Med . 2006 ; 3 : e307 . the thromboembolism prevalence in different groups of travelers , and revealed that when it comes to car travel , the drivers had a higher rate of VTE than passengers . 2 In the MEGA ( Multiple Environmental and Genetic Assessment ) study , which is a large , ongoing case-control study on risk factors for venous thrombosis in an unselected population , all modes of travel were associated with a two-fold Visit ashclinicalnews . org / you-make-the-call to view increased risk of venous thrombosis . 3 The risk of flying next month ’ s clinical dilemma , and send in your responses to ashclinicalnews @ hematology . org was the same as the risk of traveling by car , bus , or train .
Consult a Colleague is a service for ASH members that helps facilitate the exchange of information between hematologists and their peers . ASH members can seek consultation on clinical cases from qualified experts in 11 categories :
• Anemias
• Hematopoietic cell transplantation
• Hemoglobinopathies
• Hemostasis / thrombosis
• Lymphomas
• Lymphoproliferative disorders
• Leukemias
• Multiple myeloma & Waldenström macroglobulinemia
• Myeloproliferative disorders
• Myelodysplastic syndromes
• Thrombocytopenias
Assigned volunteers (“ colleagues ”) will respond to inquiries within two business days ( either by email or phone ).
Have a puzzling clinical dilemma ? Submit a question , and read more about Consult a Colleague volunteers at hematology . org / Clinicians / Consult . aspx or scan the QR code .
* If you have a request related to a hematologic disorder not listed here , please email your recommendation to ashconsult @ hematology . org so it can be considered for addition in the future .
DISCLAIMER : ASH does not recommend or endorse any specific tests , physicians , products , procedures , or opinions , and disclaims any representation , warranty , or guaranty as to the same . Reliance on any information provided in this article is solely at your own risk .
52 ASH Clinical News September 2017

Letters to the Editor

You Make the Call
Expert Opinion
Next Month ’ s Clinical Dilemma :
Consult a Colleague Through ASH

A Thought-Provoking Question

In our September issue , Elisabeth M . Battinelli , MD , PhD , responded to a colleague seeking advice on managing a patient who developed deep-vein thrombosis ( DVT ) after extended periods of travel . Based on the details of the case , Dr . Battinelli concluded that the DVT was provoked and recommended three months of anticoagulation . As always , we asked readers for their opinions , and we received dozens of responses offering different perspectives on the clinical dilemma . David A . Garcia , MD , professor of medicine at the University of Washington School of Medicine in Seattle , Washington , shared his interpretation of the dilemma – highlighting the lack of evidence to help guide these decisions .
September 2017 You Make the Call
Want to Learn More ? ASH is collaborating with the GRADE center at McMaster University to develop clinical practice guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of VTE . For more details , visit hematology . org / guidelines .
to the editor :
In the September 2017 “ You Make the Call ,” Dr . Battinelli responded to a question regarding a DVT that developed after extended travel . I respectfully disagree with Dr . Battinelli ’ s conclusion , perhaps because I have a different interpretation of the available evidence .
After describing a scenario in which a healthy , 42-year-old woman ( not taking estrogen ) experienced a DVT less than one week after a 2.5-hour flight and a 2.5-hour automobile trip , Dr . Battinelli concluded that this was a “ provoked ” event and recommended that anticoagulation be discontinued after three months . The implication of this recommendation is that the treating physician is confident that the risk of extended anticoagulation would be greater than the benefit .
While there is high-quality evidence that recurrent venous thromboembolism ( VTE ) will be very infrequent in patients whose anticoagulation is discontinued three to six months after a postsurgical thrombosis , 1 I am not aware of any comparable data that establish a similarly low recurrence risk in patients who stop anticoagulation after travel-associated thrombosis .
I acknowledge that long-distance travel is associated with VTE risk , but the association is much weaker than , for example , the link between surgery and VTE . Indeed , the case-control study cited in Dr . Battinelli ’ s response indicates that recent high-risk surgery has an odds ratio ( OR ) for VTE of 140 , whereas the corresponding OR for recent travel longer than four hours is 2.2 . 2 The very small effect of travel on VTE risk is perhaps best illustrated by a systematic review that indicates the risk of a symptomatic VTE event is one per 4,600 flights of more than four hours duration . 3
Given the multicausal nature of VTE and the small absolute effect of air travel on thrombosis risk , I am reluctant to conclude that any travel-associated VTE event was “ provoked .” Instead , I typically presume that , although the travel likely contributed to the development of thrombosis , most patients who experience a DVT or pulmonary embolism following an airplane flight or a car ride remain at risk for recurrence , if or when anticoagulation is discontinued . Pending evidence to the contrary , I approach patients with travel-associated VTE as if they had an “ unprovoked ” event because the available evidence does not establish that the future risk of VTE is low in this population , and extended anticoagulation therapy is quite safe .
Sincerely ,
David A . Garcia , MD University of Washington
Seattle , WA
REFERENCES
1 . Baglin T , Luddington R , Brown K , Baglin C . Incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism in relation to clinical and thrombophilic risk factors : prospective cohort study . Lancet . 2003 ; 362:523-6 .
2 . MacCallum PK , Ashby D , Hennessy EM , et al . Cumulative flying time and risk of venous thromboembolism . Br J Haematol . 2011 ; 155:613-9 .
3 . Kuipers S , Schreijer AJ , Cannegieter SC , et al . Travel and venous thrombosis : a systematic review . JAMA Intern Med . 2007 ; 262:615-34 .

Dr . Battinelli ’ s response :

Have a comment about an article ? Let us know what you think ; we welcome your feedback . Email the editor at ACNEditor @ hematology . org .
Although it is true that , as Dr . Garcia pointed out , there is a lack of high-quality , robust clinical trial data on travel-associated VTE , consensus guidelines suggest that travel poses a reversible risk for the development of VTE .
The more nuanced question asked in this “ You Make the Call ” dilemma was whether the risk was cumulative with multiple shorter intervals of travel . Based on these expert guidelines and studies assessing the cumulative risk of travel , I addressed concerns regarding cumulative exposure to this provoking risk factor .
Guidelines published in Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis , 9th edition , establish that provoking reasons for VTE include nonsurgical transient risk
factors such as estrogen therapy , pregnancy , injury to an extremity , or travel , and recommend anticoagulation for three months . 1 Multiple reviews have characterized the risk factors for thrombosis , and long-distance travel continues to be considered a provoking risk factor . 2 , 3 In a 2010 review , Watson and Baglin nicely summarized the data and established guidelines on travel-related VTE , indicating that , although the risk is small , there is evidence that long-distance travel does represent a risk factor for development of VTE . 4 Based on their literature review , they concluded that this applies to all forms of travel and increases based on travel duration .
While new data with direct oral anticoagulants suggest that
anticoagulation is safe in this population , again , robust data are lacking on continued , indefinite anticoagulation in this patient population . To date , the longest duration of extended anticoagulation in high-quality clinical trials is just six to 12 months . 5 , 6 Given that the cumulative travel in this patient is felt to be the provoking factor for VTE , in accordance with expert consensus regarding duration of anticoagulation post travel associated VTE , the recommendation to stop anticoagulation at three months is supported . 1
Elisabeth M . Battinelli , MD , PhD Harvard Medical School
Brigham and Women ’ s Hospital Boston , MA
REFERENCES
1 . Kearon C , Aki EA , Ornelas J , et al . Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease : CHEST guideline and expert panel report . Chest . 2016 ; 149:315-52 .
2 . Crous-Bou M , Harrington LB , Kabrhel C . Environmental and genetic risk factors associated with venous thromboembolism . Semin Thromb Hemost . 2016 ; 42:808-20 .
3 . White RH . Identifying risk factors for venous thromboembolism . Circulation . 2012 ; 125:2051-3 .
4 . Watson HG , Baglin TP . Guidelines on travel-related venous thrombosis . Br J Haematol . 2010 ; 152:31-4 .
5 . Weitz JI , Lensing AWA , Prins MH , et al . Rivaroxaban or aspirin for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism . N Engl J Med . 2017 ; 376:1211-22 .
6 . Agnelli G , Butler HR , Cohen A , et al . Apixaban for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism . N Engl J Med . 2013 ; 368:700-8 .
10 ASH Clinical News November 2017