ASEBL Journal Volume 11, Number 1 | Page 11

ASEBL Journal – Volume 11 Issue 1, January 2015 The consequences of the feud for the rival houses now affect the state, as embodied by the Prince and his kinsmen. Though the Prince could lawfully demand the lives of both Montague and Capulet (1.1.95; 1.2.1-3), he is instead merciful; the fee for their crimes will be paid in money, for the benefit of the city, rather than in blood, which would satisfy only his personal desire for revenge – putting into sharp contrast the state and kinship-based models of society. “A plague o’ both your houses” Mercutio’s resonating curse serves as a prelude to the turning point of the play (Romeo’s slaying of Tybalt; see below), and is taken by Raymond Utterback (1973) to be the cause of its remaining events (107). While the remainder of the events do stem from Mercutio’s death, they nevertheless fit within the larger framework of the traditional feud (the actions of ancestral Montague and Capulet and their descendants) that serves as the ultimate cause of all of the negative consequences in the play. At this point the play undergoes a tonal change, as Jay Halio (1998) notes: “What seemed to be a largely comic invention turns at that point to tragedy” (21). However, given the content of the Prologue, the brawling in the opening scene, Tybalt’s attitude at the Capulet party, Juliet’s concern about Romeo’s safety whilst on Capulet grounds, and Benvolio’s words of caution (“the day is hot”), it seems the audience is never far removed by means of “comic invention” from the tragedy that inevitably awaits its characters. Thus, we agree with Halio that “Overarching all the action of the play, and in one sense its alternative main plot, is the feud between the rival families” (p. 28, emphasis added), but qualify this agreement by emphasizing that so intertwined is the feud with the love story that it is nonsensical to see them as alternatives. Mercutio’s death and curse are likewise inseparable from the feud, without which he would not have provoked Tybalt (who was perpetuating the feud in seeking Romeo), in defense of his friend and fellow citizen. The purpose of the “infectious pestilence,” as