Art Chowder March | April, Issue 20 | Page 24

R ainbow’s paintings are like a visualization of how memory functions; you might see a painting in a gallery of a horse, a bison, or a warrior — and like anyone looking at art you begin to imbue the image with your personal impressions, the emotions and events of which you are reminded by the brushstrokes. Touraine’s work, however, dares you to take that phenomenon a step further in when you suddenly realize she’s begun the process for you, sneaking hidden faces and silhouettes into cloud formations; or clumps of hair or grass; or the billowed wing of an eagle. These interpolated renderings are less developed, more subliminal, and yet distinctly recognizable. Once you visually fit those implied memories into the more obvious picture, like a “Magic Eye” puzzle, then you may take in the painting with your own mind. Does she have an agenda or is this just how her brain works? The answer is Yes. Her broker, Spokane local Jay Moynahan, tells me she would paint extremely big and extremely fast, “She’d go crashing into it…” She worked ambidextrously, painting with both hands at the same time, as if she couldn’t get the image out fast enough, barely eating or sleeping for days. She’d start at the top of a 4’x6’ Masonite board and work down, layering images upon images between swaths of glaze, giving each life-sized piece a feeling of looking through water, or space. It wasn’t realism (though she could do that), and it wasn’t quite surrealism either (though she did that too). You could compare her to Salvador Dali, Georgia O’Keefe, or even Frida if you like, with a nod to a life being a genuine stance. But Touraine is independent, adaptable, informable, and tends to focus more on universal themes than introspective ones. 24 ART CHOWDER MAGAZINE