ARRC Journal 2018 | Page 42

ARRC JOURNAL AIR C2 CHALLENGES IN CORPS WARFIGHTING Gp Capt Chris Mullen (GBR-AF) As the ARRC continues on its path to Corps Recalibration - beginning with the C2 and Close Battle on ARRCADE FUSION 17 (AF17) and refocusing on the Corps Deep Battle for the first half of 2018 - it has become clear that there is a need to address the delivery of Air-Land Integration (ALI); including the functionality required at the Corps level and more importantly, the Air C2 construct that will enable the requisite authorities and permissions to support the desired integration of effects. This short article describes the current C2 model, why the potential to operate as a Corps in a Major Joint Operation (MJO) against a near-peer enemy has driven the need for review, and the activity underway to present potential options for HQ AIRCOM and NATO. Current NATO ALI Model The current ALI model used by NATO is enabled through permanently embedded Air Operations Coordination Cells (AOCCs) within the 9 High Readiness Force (Land) (HRF(L)) HQs; they are tasked with providing air advice to the Corps Commander whilst supporting the Corps Plan, Refine and Execute activity on behalf of HQ AIRCOM and the nominated Air Component Commander in the event of Operations. The AOCCs are further supported by additional air liaison or coordination elements from the nominated Air Component should the Corps be required to act as the Land Component Command (LCC or Joint Task Force HQ (JTFHQ) as part of the Long Term Rotation Plan. Recent experience on Exs TRIDENT JUNCTURE 16 and AF17 has demonstrated that providing support to the plan and refine functions is an achievable task, especially given the permanent nature of the AOCC within the Corps. However, delivery of an execute function presents a fundamentally different challenge. Situated within the OPCEN, the AOCC would be required to enable the apportionment of aircraft assigned to Air Power Contribution to Land Operations (ACPLO) tasks, service immediate requests for additional air support and manage the airspace requirements in a potentially dynamic scenario. All of this activity requires direct communication to the Joint Force Air Component (JFAC) and any Joint Tactical Air Controllers (JTACs) supporting the Divisions and Brigades. However, a differing equipment provision and manning structure across the 9 AOCCs has led to a the default ‘procedural’ position whereby the AOCC staff enable the dynamic control of aircraft and airspace but rely upon the JFAC to execute the task via airborne or ground-based Command and Control assets. Changing Requirement Whilst a purely procedural approach has proved to be effective in a low intensity and relatively permissive environment, where we are able to retain control of Air C2 in Corps Warfighting 1 COD; functional area of JFAC that enables the execute function. 42 ALLIED RAPID REACTION CORPS the air and aircraft can be handed over to JTACs in order to support the land forces, it is judged to be overly restrictive and time consuming should the tempo and complexity increase. Indeed, as Ex AF17 demonstrated, the enemy threat, complexity, contested environment and competition for resources presented by an MJO will require a more flexible approach. Furthermore, if faced with a near-peer enemy, it will be imperative that we are able to maximise our operational effectiveness through careful integration of our fires, aviation and air resources during planned and dynamic activity. In such a scenario, procedural deconfliction, through time and/or space may prove to be counter-productive and limit the utility of our capabilities. Therefore, there is a clear requirement for Air personnel in