ARRC Journal 2018 | Page 18

ARRC JOURNAL ENABLING CRISIS RESPONSE: LESSONS FROM EX NOBLE JUMP 17 Capt Mark Matthews (GBR-A) Exercise NOBLE JUMP 17 (NOJP17) tested NATO’s ability to deploy the Land elements of its Very High Readiness Joint Task Force across Europe to Romania. Although NOJP17 was an exercise, it was a deployment of force conducted in real time, over real terrain and in the public domain. In doing so, it lay a vital element of NATO’s Graduated Response Planning at the feet of both the NATO public and its potential adversaries; bringing with it both risk and rewards for NATO Deterrence and Reassurance messaging. Deploying military force; with the right equipment, sustained to fight, in a timely manner, with the approval of all nations involved is a hugely complex task. To organise this, a deploying force would normally be preceded by logistic enablers to facilitate the Reception Staging and Onward Movement (RSOM) process. Depending on the size of the deployment, this presence could be as small as a Company Quartermaster’s Team, or as large as a Support Brigade. With the need for the Very High Readiness Joint Task Force (VJTF) to be light and rapidly deployable, this traditional deployment method will not work. Due to deployment timelines and the need to concentrate fighting power, the VJTF has no assigned RSOM units, whilst the rest of the NATO A convoy on the move during Ex NOBLE JUMP 17 18 ALLIED RAPID REACTION CORPS Response Forces (NRF) are enabled by the strength of the Joint Logistic Support Group (JLSG). To mitigate this, NATO relies heavily on advanced planning and the extensive use of Host Nation Support. This approach is best suited to defending known territories and not for an Expeditionary Force. National infrastructure, governmental agencies and existing routes can all be pre-identified and used to support deployment of forces, but theory can only go so far. Testing this model of deployment is essential to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the concept, and led to the development and execution of Ex NOJP17. The exercise saw elements of the VJTF, from seven nations, deploy from across NATO territory to the Cincu training area in Romania. At its core, NOJP17 involved the deployment of over 2500 personnel and five hundred vehicles by road, rail, sea and air. The RSOM planning for this was done by the Allied Rapid Reaction Corps Enabling Command (ARRC EC) as part of the 2017 NATO Response Force (Land) JLSG HQ. As a multinational one star organisation, ARRC EC supported and augmented by representatives from NATO Force Integration Units (NFIU), Troop Contributing Nations (TCNs), Host, and Transit Nations created the RSOM plan and delivered the function of a Theatre Entry Logistic Headquarters. Having identified that the deployment of the VJTF falls outside the remit of the JLSG, HQ ARRC took NOJP17 as a chance to trial both a high readiness Theatre Entry capability and the Advanced JLSG (A-JLSG) concept. The A-JLSG is formed by a small element of the JLSG, held at a higher readiness and A rest and refuel stop at one of the Convoy Support Centres on Ex NOBLE JUMP 17 made up of personnel with the specific trade skills and experience required to enable RSOM. This advance element was charged with ensuring deployment of the VJTF but also setting conditions for the arrival of the NRF follow-on forces and the remainder of the JLSG. The plan relied heavily on contracted and Host Nation support, which created considerable discomfort for some. To ease this friction, detailed planning was conducted to augment the existing NATO deployment plan and ensure the right support was in the right place, at the right time, with the correct diplomatic clearances and contracts to back them up. Once the plan was finalised, it was rehearsed through a Table Top Exercise. This event was the first time the team from HQ ARRC met with HQ Multinational Division South-East (MND-SE). Based in Bucharest, MND-SE became the lead for execution as the RSOM HQ. To deliver