Arlington Municipal Airport Development Plan Arlington Airport Development Plan | Page 160
ing hot days as jet engines are less efficient during higher temperatures. Weight restrictions generally
correlate with taking on less fuel, boarding fewer passengers, or hauling less cargo.
The 2008 Master Plan and 2009 ALD both call for a future runway length of 6,780 feet. An extension to
the runway will not be simplistic as the Airport has been encroached on all sides by urban residential,
commercial, and industrial development.
Furthermore, the Airport is bound to the
The 2008 Master Plan and 2009 ALD both call
north and south by existing roadways,
for a future runway length of 6,780 feet.
which include U.S. Interstate 20 to the
north and Southeast Green Oaks Boule‐
vard to the south. Moreover, on‐airport and adjacent land topography will present significant chal‐
lenges to runway extension options. Further challenging matters is that the south end of Runway 16‐
34 does not conform to RSA and ROFA standards as previously discussed.
Given the complexities involved with a potential runway extension at Arlington Municipal Airport, the
alternatives analysis in this chapter will consider a 700‐foot extension as proposed on the FAA and
TxDOT‐approved ALD. Due to the proximity of Southeast Green Oaks Boulevard adjacent to the south
end of the runway, the alternatives will only consider a northerly extension. The alternatives will make
distinctions from the extension as outlined on the existing ALD and the proposed extension meeting
updated FAA design criteria, in particular for RSA and RPZ standards.
RUNWAY WIDTH
The FAA design standard for runway width is based on the RDC and approach visibility minimums to
the runway. Runway 16‐34 at Arlington Municipal Airport is currently 100 feet wide and meets the
standard for RDC C‐II design criteria.
FAA design standards call for a runway width of 150 feet to serve aircraft up to RDC C‐III with a maxi‐
mum certificated takeoff weight of 150,000 pounds or less when the approach visibility minimums to
the runway are lower than ¾‐mile. Since the approach visibility minimums on Runway 34 are ½‐mile,
planning should consider widening the runway to 150 feet in the event the Airport transitions to RDC
C‐III. Exhibit 4C depicts the potential widening of Runway 16‐34 by adding 25 feet of pavement to
each side of the centerline.
RUNWAY STRENGTH
The pavement strength for Runway 16‐34 is reported at 60,000 pounds single wheel loading (SWL).
While aircraft weighing more than the certified strength can operate on the runway, the life span of
the pavements can be shortened due to the utilization of these heavier loads over time.
Chapter Four - 14