Architect and Builder March/April 2016 | Page 20

project costs project fee project size SIMON BERRY Simon Berry started Fresh Projects in 2014, after seeing how talentflight to more lucrative sectors had decimated the Engineering Professions in the UK (where he worked for nearly a decade). South Africa’s Built Environment sector still attracts quality professionals, { value of works x fee scales x discount economic environment fixed overheads design value quality of employee quality of client quality of professional team salary x efficacy labour costs employee labour rate x hours spent changes meeting frequency } project duration project size but this is changing rapidly because of the broken underlying economics of the industry. Fresh Projects vision is to make the Built Environment Services Sector financially sustainable. We make the planning and financial management of time-based projects an order of magnitude easier for busy owners of small and medium engineering and architectural firms – delivering higher profit margins and removing the stress associated with feeling out of control. Tel: 079 049 4979 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.freshprojects.co.za 18 with international best practice. The writing is on the wall: in the long term, fee scales will cease to exist – and I would argue that this is the best thing that can happen to our industry. Fee guidelines are evil. They are like cigarettes – they make you feel good, but are, in fact, killing you. They make us lazy and irresponsible. Instead of calculating what a job will cost us (like most other professions do), we simply apply a formula that someone else gave us to determine our fee.The main input to this formula is the cost of works, which serves as a tenuous proxy for amount of effort (more expensive building = more hours), but ignores a multitude of other factors that dictate the real effort (quality of client, quality of employees, quality of professional team, quality of council, etc). Then, on top of this, we apply an arbitrary, yet ever increasing, discount against the guideline fee. And just to make matters a bit more unclear, we have a new set of fee guidelines that are nearly 40% higher than the previous published guidelines – resulting in further confusion as to what the ‘real’ fee should be. In fact, the answer is simple – the ‘real’ fee should be the fee that covers your costs and provides a reasonable profit margin. The fee should not be determined by some evil and confusing fee guideline, it should be determined by the number of hours that it takes your highly skilled resources to deliver a job.This is how lawyers, accountants and doctors operate, so why don’t we? However, our clients (the savvy property developers) would never agree to open ended contracts where we are simply paid by the hour for as long as the job takes. But accountants and lawyers also have to provide fixed lump sum fees for larger jobs – the difference is that they take the time, up front, to estimate how many hours the job will take so that, on the whole, their businesses (and their professions) are profitable and sustainable. I am sure the thought of doing this extra admin on all jobs leaves you cold – after all, architects love designing, not administration - but there are tools available that make the task of job costing relatively painless. And the upside to doing a proper fee calculation (as well as tracking your costs during the project lifecycle) is that you will likely be more profitable. Which means you can invest in and retain the best talent. Which means you can do better jobs more efficiently and effectively. Which ultimately means, you can focus more on doing more of the things you love doing, like designing. Fee Debate