Applied Coaching Research Journal Research Journal 1 | Page 13
APPLIED COACHING RESEARCH JOURNAL 2018, Vol. 1
drawing together an edited video of their coaching
role models. Project-based learning might also
serve coaches well in learning across different
disciplines. For example, a coach might learn about
biomechanical principles through producing a new
piece of equipment for coaching, or learn about
physiological testing by devising a way to test
specific sport relevant parameters. A good example
of this is where undergraduate media students
at Canterbury Christ Church University develop a
media project for a local football club. The football
club meets with each group to describe their needs
(eg to attract players for a new team) and the
groups are asked to respond with a product that the
football club are able to use. This is a good example
of the support required for the learner during this
process, highlighted by the research described
above. Learners are introduced to principles
and skills that enable them to work through the
advertising process from start to finish, including
meeting with the client and agreeing outcomes,
generating a pitch to the client, and producing
a “leave behind” portfolio of information that
provides a rationale for their final product.
Summary and conclusions
In order to develop a better understanding of what
methods of coach education work, it is evident that
a greater focus on research exploring the benefits
and challenges of these approaches within coach
education is warranted. Furthermore, understanding
the impacts of such learning on the athletes being
coached may provide further evidence relating to
the effectiveness of this learning.
Despite the lack of research evidence specific to
coaches, there are a number of applications to
coach education that can be developed from the
available literature and examples in this article.
Although deriving from different approaches, the
themes of collaboration and problem solving are
inherent across all discussions, and the support of
technology, and in particular mobile technology,
appears to be an area ripe for further exploration.
A key feature of all approaches is the role of the
tutor or facilitator. An effective tutor or facilitator
should be well equipped to be able to effectively
guide and manage the group processes, while
also providing a degree of autonomy for learners.
Highlighted within all approaches is the importance
of developing the skills of the learners to manage
the styles of learning required to fully participate,
and this is likely to be a pivotal first stage in
successful implementation. Finally, and perhaps
most essentially, is that the learner is at the centre
of the approaches discussed here. Although there
are opportunities here to enable coach educators
to create impactful learning situations using these
approaches, coaches too can drive their own
learning process. Without waiting for specific
coach education interventions, coaches may find
it possible to implement some of these learning
activities by engaging in collaborative forums
with other coaches, setting up problem-solving
working groups or considering how they engage
in projects relevant to their learning needs.
References
Cushion, C., Nelson, L., Armour, K., Lyle, J., Jones,
R., Sandford, R. and O’Callaghan, C. (2010) Coach
Learning and Development: A Review of Literature.
Leeds: sports coach UK (now UK Coaching).
1
2 Reviews used can be identified in the main report.
3 http://www.mentornet.net
Gilbert, W. and Trudel, P. (2001) ‘Learning to coach
through experience: Reflection in model youth sport
coaches’, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,
21: 16-34.
4
Savery, J. R. (2006) ‘Overview of problem-based
learning: Definitions and distinctions’, Essential
Readings in Problem-based Learning: Exploring and
Extending the Legacy of Howard S. Barrows: 5-15.
5
Contact
Katie Dray – [email protected]
13