Anti-Semitic Targeting of Journalists During the 2016 Presidential Ca | Page 6
While the data are not designed to show why the
attackers chose Twitter, the harassers clearly identified
Twitter as a target-rich environment journalists routinely
use and depend on Twitter for sharing information,
soliciting sources and disseminating their work.
We cannot conclude that Mr. Trump’s extensive use of
Twitter “encouraged” these attacks. Mr. Trump’s use of
Twitter as a key communications tool is notable, but the
platform is used extensively by all candidates.
We are also not attributing the abuse to the Twitter
platform: as with all of the major social media companies,
Twitter does not proactively monitor and regulate speech,
but like other platforms, claims to respond when hate
speech is reported. The issue of whether Twitter has
* The above word cloud is based on the 2.6 million tweets.
succeeded on this front is addressed later in this report.
DETAILED FINDINGS
ADL conducted a search of tweets using a broad set of
keywords (and keyword combinations) designed by ADL
to capture anti-Semitic language. These keywords did
not include any terms associated directly with the 2016
presidential campaign. This yielded 2.6 million results.
These 2.6 million tweets, which were posted by 1.7
million Twitter users, appeared an estimated 10 billion
times – which means that this language was potentially
seen 10 billion times. That’s roughly the equivalent social
media exposure advertisers could expect from a $20
million Super Bowl ad - a juggernaut of bigotry we believe
reinforces and normalizes anti-Semitic language and
tropes on a massive scale.
* The above word cloud is based on the 19,253 anti-Semitic Tweets
directed at 800 journalists.
* To the left are the
most common Twitter
hashtags appearing
in the anti-Semitic
Our next step, a manual review of tweets containing
anti-Semitic language yielded 19,253 overtly anti-Semitic
tweets mentioning 800 journalists. The 19,253 Tweets
were seen approximately 45 million times, and sixty
percent of these tweets were replies with anti-Semitic
content sent directly to journalists or other users.
tweets
Sixty-eight percent of the 19,253 Tweets were sent by 1,600
Twitter users, confirming that these were persistent attacks
on journalists by a relatively small cohort of Twitter users.
5