per Law Commission of India reports around 40 % of the cases are Traffic Challans though around 7.8 % of the cases are Check Bounce cases . For the Traffic Challans regulated system is being deal with by different State governments , for example , online installments and so forth . However , as for the framework of handling the issue of Check Bounce cases is not working and focus has even proposed for a correction for stricter fines / discipline for handling a similar issue , yet would the same be in a monetary sense proficient for the economy or have no change or would rather be tricky to the general public is the issue that we ' ll address in a similar paper .
Unmistakably in Check Bounce cases there is some externality that is keeping the ideal result which the offended party anticipates that before giving purview will the court to decree the matter . Subsequently in this paper we would address the issue of such problematic result from the point of view of standards , for example , pareto effectiveness , diversion hypothesis and so on ., to know where the actual holes exist for such a result .