AML Digest July 2018 AML Digest July 2018 | Page 5
Caribbean AML|CFT Intelligence
AML Digest | July/August 2018
What CFATF has to say about the state of Beneficial Ownership
The Caribbean Financial Action Task Force has put the spotlight very much on the issue of Beneficial Ownership in the 4th round
of Mutual Evaluations which in turn placed great emphasis on effectiveness. Below are extracts from the MERs for Barbados and
Trindad and Tobago which help to illuminate the current local issues surrounding the implementation of effective Beneficial
Ownership regimes. MER findings help compliance departments to understand the thinking behind the regulations and to posi-
tion their departments for full compliance.
BARBADOS
TRINIDAD & TOBAGO
Beneficial Ownership (BO) information of legal persons is
obtained and available at the company’s registered office
or at the office of the service provider. There is no infor-
mation that the competent authorities have verified and
confirmed the implementation of the maintenance of the
BO information by the service providers..
With the exception of the FSC and CBB, the procedures
adopted by licensing/registration authorities to vet and
approve post licensing/ post registration changes in ben-
eficial ownership are generally not sufficiently robust
Registration and licensing authorities should review their
licensing/registration procedures to ensure that subse-
quent changes in beneficial ownership are adequately
recorded, vetted and approved (post or pre)
The competent or supervisory authorities have not
demonstrated the application of sanctions where there is
a failure to comply with filing and record keeping require-
ments or obligations to keep upto-date information re-
garding basic and beneficial ownership
Trinidad and Tobago should ensure that FIs and LBs, pri-
marily Credit Unions and SIFIs, take immediate steps to
identify and verify the beneficial ownership of all ac-
counts including legal entities and arrangements that
were in place prior to the FOR amendments which re-
quired RDD and take corrective action to rectify cases of
non-compliance.
There is no consistent application by LBs relative to rec-
ord-keeping measures which includes beneficial owner-
ship information along with ongoing monitoring. The As-
sessors were not satisfied that business is refused when
CDD information is incomplete. Supervisors should en-
sure that LBs maintain effective recordkeeping proce-
dures and that transactions are suspended when CDD
information is not provided
Trinidad and Tobago should ensure that FIs and LBs, pri-
marily Credit Unions and SIFIs, take immediate steps to
identify and verify the beneficial ownership of legal enti-
ties and arrangements that were in place prior to the FOR
amendments which required RDD and take corrective
action to rectify cases of non-compliance.
FREE
You can get free issues of this newsletter for the next two issues
by sending email to
[email protected] to be added to our mailing list.
5