Agri Kultuur July / Julie 2016 | Page 41

ly, dependent on how much the UK also trades with SA’s other significant trading partners. The possible effect on the GBP-ZAR exchange rate of a Brexit is more indirect. The UK is facing a large capital outflow due to investors that want to pre-empt an exit of the UK from the EU. The outflow of capital is causing the British pound to depreciate against both the Euro and the US dollar. The capital outflow causes a general weakening of the pound. Due to the general depreciation of the pound the South African rand could strengthen relative to the pound. Even though this may be good for trade, it may spell trouble for global capital markets as well as the currency market. UK and South African agricultural trade – a significant relationship… The EU is the largest agricultural trading partner with the UK, and agricultural imports from the EU into the UK accounts for around 54% of the UK’s total agricultural imports over this period. The UK agriculture imports from South Africa represent more than 10% of the total imports into the UK from South Africa during the last 5 years, while it accounts for around 3.5% of total agricultural produce imports into the UK for the same period. Within the agricultural imports from South Africa, products in the broad grouping of “Edible fruit and nuts” contributes the major share - at more than 90% of South Africa’s agricultural exports to the UK If one however considers that processed food and beverages are also major export products from South Africa to the UK (around 3.5% of all imports into the UK are from South Africa), the effect on agriculture production and sales through “indirect” means in terms of higher value added produce also need to be considered. What can SA do to weather the Brexit storm? There are both positives and negatives for South Africa in a Brexit realising. Some thoughts for business executives and policy makers: On the positive side - as a result of Brexit it becomes possible for SA to renegotiate trade agreements with the UK in a more favourable light and also export to UK products that are currently prohibited for reasons specific to the EU agreement and not relevant to the UK, e.g. Port wine. It could also be that the EU will want to penalise the UK in terms of a future agreement, and that the UK in return will attempt to set up favourable terms with the rest of the world to replace some of the products currently being imported into the UK from the EU. In this context it may be positive for South African agricultural product exporters. Seasonal differences between South Africa and Europe have resulted in the EU be- coming a key market for South African agricultural produce, as well as the main market for South African manufactured exports. Business decision makers and policy ma kers need to consider these type of implications and pro-actively investigate realistic export opportunities for agriculture products from South Africa into the UK that could utilise a potential gap that could develop between the UK and EU in terms of agricultural trade; On the negative side - UK capital or FDI flows into South Africa would come under some pressure as it seeks to deal with the adjustment period and policy makers need to be prepared for potential fall-outs as a result – e.g. some planned investments potentially being cancelled and credit lines reduced; - UK exports to the EU will potentially slow down as they lose the advantages of the EU Common Agricultural Policies; this will also affect South Africa, especially primary and intermediate exports that are used in production inputs in UK products, such as products from the mining and minerals sector and some agro-processing to name but a few. This will not bode well for South Africa’s already embattled mining industry in the short to medium term; - Renegotiation of trade agreements