Aged Care Insite Issue 117 | Feb-Mar 2020 | Page 10

industry & reform The time for action is now Royal commission calls for mandated staff minimums. By Conor Burke T he Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety has urged the sector to reform its approach to the workforce, with counsel assisting Peter Rozen telling those gathered that “the time for real action … is now”. At the third Adelaide hearing, Rozen handed the commission a submission made by the counsels assisting which said that the sector should be subject to mandatory minimum staffing requirements and to make sure there is an RN on duty for every shift, among other recommendations. “The staff in our aged care homes … are not well paid. All too often, there are not enough of them to provide the care that they would like to; for example, to sit and have a chat over a cup of tea,” Rozen told the commissioners. “Many work in stressful and sometimes unsafe workplaces, some are untrained, and others have inadequate training. As a community, we owe these workers a lot.” The submission also states that RNs and NPs should make up a greater proportion of the workforce, that regulated care workers should be registered and show a minimum qualification level, and that all aged care workers should be better paid and trained. Rozen stated that, ultimately, change in the sector will occur only if those in leadership positions change their approach to aged care. “The organisations for which they work should be better managed and better 8 agedcareinsite.com.au governed. And finally, the Australian government should provide practical leadership in relation to all these things,” Rozen said. The submission has been welcomed by the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF), which has for a long time called for minimum staffing levels and nurse-to-patient ratios. ANMF federal secretary Annie Butler said: “On behalf of our members working in aged care, the ANMF welcomes Mr Rozen’s practical recommendations put forward to the royal commissioners. “As we’ve heard from our members in aged care and in the harrowing evidence from residents and their families, workforce issues, particularly inadequate staffing levels, have been the cause of much of their pain and suffering. “The ANMF supports Mr Rozen’s recommendations to mandate the minimum numbers of nurses and qualified care staff that would be rostered, ensuring better, safer, continuity of care for residents. “Better wages, training and regulation would also improve the retention and recruitment of the beleaguered aged care workforce.” Aged & Community Services Australia (ACSA) agreed that workforce levels need to be addressed and said that the sector will need additional resources to raise overall numbers. “ACSA supports a star rating system in principle, provided it doesn’t create a two- tiered system,” said ACSA chief executive Pat Sparrow. “The proposed system includes a range of staff and occupations and acknowledges that residents have different needs which require different levels of support and skill combinations, which will also better reflect and support the increasing acuity of residents.” ACSA said that, if the aged care sector was to implement a star rating system, it would mean an increase of 37.2 per cent in total staffing, for residents to receive at least a four-star level of care. “ACSA strongly supports comments that additional resourcing is required to achieve this increase in staffing,” Sparrow said. “What we know now is that aged care simply isn’t funded to provide the level of care people expect and deserve. “A new direction like this could be exactly what we need to force a rethink and set up Australia for our ageing population and the decades to come.” Leading Age Services Australia (LASA) agreed that raising staff levels is not possible in the current system, but disagreed with the recommendation to implement mandated minimum staffing requirements, suggesting this may hinder innovation in the sector. “We agree with counsel assisting’s observation that realising more staff in aged care is not possible under the current funding system,” said LASA chief executive Sean Rooney. “The problem is that the average aged care operator struggles to cover their current costs at existing funding levels. We have long advocated for funding for good quality care to be linked to the cost of delivering good quality care, including a reasonable financial margin, to maintain viability. “Achieving the best quality care is paramount, and we note that more staff can only be implemented with adequate funding. At the same time, we proposed in