Aged Care Insite Issue 113 | Jun-Jul 2019 | Page 41

technology Care Protect also reserves the right to report misconduct to relevant regulators in the UK if it feels residents are being neglected or if its notifications of poor practice are ignored. POTENTIAL BARRIERS TO CHANGE One barrier to CCTV installation may be the perceived cost to providers; however, Care Protect works on a leasing model and covers all installation costs. “There is no initial cost to the provider upfront. We pay for the entire installation, and we pay for all the kit. We operate on a leasing model and charge $20 per week per registered bed, plus GST,” Sterling said. “We also carry out a commissioning process. We go to the facility, meet all the residents and the families, and present to the residents and staff members, so everyone is onboard. “We provide the facilities with screens, so they can see what we see, and we also provide them with smartphones and tablets, so we can contact them whenever we see a severe event.” Another potential problem is one of privacy and abuse of the CCTV footage. “The footage cannot be exported from the technology we use,” said Sterling. “If it’s downloaded onto the server to be reviewed, it cannot be exported to, say, a USB. The only way that footage can be transferred is to an FTP drop site to the actual facility itself.” Footage and any data collected are legally protected and, in the UK at least, Care Protect cannot be compelled by a facility to delete footage. Privacy is often mentioned as a key concern for those not keen on the idea of CCTV in aged care facilities, and Care Protect has taken this on board. “If a resident is using, for example, a bedside commode and doesn’t want to be seen on that, we can redact that area through a black window that will always remain there,” Sterling said, and these windows can be placed anywhere, and only the facility manager will know about this blackspot, which does not affect the motion sensors or fall protections. “That was a game changer in the UK,” he said, as it gave residents some privacy while ensuring vigilance. As for staff who may be wary of being filmed, Care Protect says the technology is for their safety as well. Sterling recalls an incident in the UK where initially the staff in Care Protect homes wanted to walk off the job over the introduction of CCTV. “About four weeks after installation, there was a malfunction with one of the bed hoists and a patient was injured and taken to hospital,” he said. “The resident actually blamed two staff members. But we were able to review the footage and see that the bed hoist was faulty, so the two staff members were vindicated. “And now our staff say, ‘We wouldn’t work anywhere without cameras now, because it really does protect us and residents’.” However, Dr Bruce Baer Arnold, from the Faculty of Business, Government and Law at the University of Canberra, believes legal problems could arise. “South Australia still doesn’t have an information privacy act,” he said. “It has not recognised a tort [a legal cause of action allowing compensation] for serious invasions of privacy. Adoption of CCTV needs to be undertaken within a coherent legal framework. “We have a large literature on the use of CCTV in schools and prisons … much of which suggests that some offenders simply shift the location of the abuse [that is, they harm the victim out of sight of the camera; for example, in a hallway or a bathroom]. “Politicians and bureaucrats in search of a good news story or headline tend to think of CCTV and other technology as a silver bullet without taking a deep breath and asking whether it will be effective and whether there is a better way – for example, training, supervision and reporting [including best-practice whistleblowing by colleagues of offenders] – to deal with particular problems.” LOOKING FORWARD Now that the green light has been given to use the technology here in Australia, Care Protect can plan for the future. “Initially, for the first facility up and running, the team from Belfast will review Australian footage,” Sterling said. “However, now that we have a projected cash flow from a 12-month commitment from SA Health, we can look at potentially opening a Care Protect hub in South Australia and employing healthcare professionals [who are registered in Australia] to monitor and review client footage in Australia. “They will be background-checked as standard, and hold relevant licences in accordance with local laws, to view CCTV.” The minister for senior Australians and aged care, Ken Wyatt, believes this is a positive step in protecting elder Australians. “Covert filming by individuals has sadly exposed poor quality of care and malpractice in some aged care settings,” Wyatt said. “The community has been asking for this, and [we are delivering] an initiative which will result in stronger protections for our elderly residents, reduced adverse incidents and improved standards of care.” Stewart Johnston, whose mother was abused in the Oakden facility, and who is now a prominent aged care campaigner, is also glad these steps are being taken. He will serve on a steering committee overseeing the pilot as a consumer representative. “This pilot will show a cutting-edge technology delivering an unparalleled safeguarding system to residents’ family and staff with dignity, privacy and choice. This is no spy camera,” Johnston told Aged Care Insite. “This pilot is a significant step forward not only for South Australia but the nation. The technology now exists where dignity and privacy don’t need to be traded for safety.”  ■ agedcareinsite.com.au 39