Aged Care Insite Issue 111 | Feb-March 2019 | Page 15

industry & reform the financial means testing does not even out across the country, telling the commission that we need a fairer system that is plain and easy for everyone to understand and would pass “the pub test”. In his written statement, Yates said: “Improving respect for older Australians will be a critical part of any future aged care system.” He also suggested a single national plan for older Australians, which would put in place strategies to eliminate ageism, as a key to future safety in the sector. Setting the scene After the end of the first day’s hearing, Clive Spriggs told Aged Care Insite how important it was for him and his mother “to be the first to present and speak, and ... to be able to speak in front of the royal commission and get our point across to them and set the scene for what’s going to happen and where things are going to go”. Asked whether they thought this was finally the time that change would occur, Barbara Spriggs was confident. “I think it has to change,” she said. “I don’t think it can any longer be pushed under the carpet. There are too many people now throughout Australia, not just South Australia, who are so aware of these issues that they can’t go unnoticed anymore. Change will happen. It has to happen.” The first day of the commission will be the last day the Spriggs family attends, happy now to allow other stories to be told, and hopefully, for them, time to move on. “It’s too confronting, too overwhelming,” Barbara Spriggs said. “I think we need to give other people space to do and say what they have to, and I don’t think it’s good for our health and wellbeing to be listening to every little detail.” Care, dignity and respect Throughout her in-depth, well-reasoned testimony, Barbara Spriggs kept returning to her husband Bob, and stumbled only when she recalled her family’s struggle to be heard and the bruised state she found him in when he was hospitalised after receiving 10 times the recommended dose of antipsychotics, suffering dehydration as well as pneumonia. “To this day, I don’t know what happened to Bob at Oakden,” she said. “I wonder about those who hurt Bob and wonder where they are now and if they are employed somewhere else.” This thought hung in the air. The phrase “care, dignity and the respect they deserve” was often repeated throughout Spriggs’ testimony and could set the tone for the year to come. She ended by saying that “my testimony will not save Bob, but I hope and pray” that the royal commission will make sure that “no one else will suffer as my husband suffered”. DAY 2: INEFFECTIVE ADVOCACY The second day of the royal commission threw up some ageing statistics and a few gripes in another day where the background problems are being laid bare for commissioners Lynelle Briggs and Richard Tracey. On the first day, five witnesses were called, including Paul Versteege, policy manager at the Combined Pensioners and Superannuants Association of NSW (CPSA), who criticised a number of aged care advocacy groups. But first up, witness Justine Louise Boland from the ABS briefed the room on the way our nation is ageing. We heard that a third of Australians aged 85 or older are in aged care, with the number of people aged 85 or older in our population set to more than double by 2066. Furthermore, and likely to pique the interest of the Australian government, the dependency ratio on those within the wage-earning population is also expected to grow. As it stands, for every 48 people who are wage earners, 52 people depend on them. By 2042, that figure will rise to 58 people for every 42 wage earners. The most contentious moments of the day came from Versteege. He used his time before the commission to take a number of workforce and advocacy groups to task for putting the providers above consumers, first taking aim at the National Aged Care Alliance (NACA). “Initially the membership of the National Aged Care Alliance was numerically dominated by aged care providers, and we believe it still is dominated by aged care providers,” he said. “At one point NACA had a direct line into government, to the office for the minister for aged care, and our concern has been and still is that an organisation, an alliance, that is dominated by a certain interest group will necessarily push those interests above all others.” Versteege also took aim at the Aged Care Workforce Taskforce, believing that the exclusion of the unions is counter- productive to sector improvements. And Commissioners Richard Tracey and Lynelle Briggs enter the room. Photo: Kelly Barnes AAP as for the Aged Care Sector Committee, he said that, again, it does not have residents’ interests at heart. Versteege also discussed poor nutrition standards in homes and times when meals would go uneaten due to understaffing. “What they found was that people were served a meal but were unable to get to it … And because staff were rushed, they would not be able to assist them. “Staff would come round and collect the uneaten meal and a person would basically not eat.” DAY 3: STAFF RATIOS Properly staffing aged care facilities with an adequate nursing skill mix and at least four hours and 18 minutes per-patient per-day care minimum would not cost the sector anything more than it currently outlays. That’s according to a report presented to the royal commission by the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) federal secretary Annie Butler. The ANMF-funded, Flinders University National Aged Care Staffing and Skills Mix Project Report made a cost-benefit analysis of the paper’s recommendations and found that although it would cost $5.3 billion to implement, any costs would be offset through tax measures and other features. Savings made by avoiding staff attrition is one such feature, which currently costs the sector $500 million. “If you had proper staffing in the places, people would feel satisfied, fulfilled in their jobs as nurses and carers, and we wouldn’t see the churn that we see,” Butler told the commission. Staffing levels were the running theme in Butler’s testimony, as well as skills mix and the pay gap between the public sector and the aged care sector. “What we hear most often from our members now is the increasing pressure they’re experiencing with workloads. agedcareinsite.com.au 13