African Mining November 2019 | Page 62

 IN THE STOPE competitive, transparent licencing with clear use-it-or- lose-it terms, and competitive conditions for exploration, development and exploitation of resources that have been made economic through private sector investment. State participation in ownership is a contentious issue. In a few cases it works. In most it does not. Where the state demands free carry, fails to invest, and act in a confl icted fashion, then it is not a good thing. Where the state is the only owner and fails to act in a responsible fashion, actively destroying wealth, it is also not a good thing. Responsible custodianship may or may not require state ownership. Yet these dimensions too often get confl ated. I tend to prefer a situation where the state owns the mineral resource, issues licenses, receives revenues through taxes – and at times super-taxes through resource rent taxes – and enforces regulation. It provides clearer rules of the game, cleaner governance, transparency and limits confl icts of interests. Some countries have got it right though, even if their policies and ideologies follow a nationalistic framework, would you agree? Absolutely. Resource nationalism is not a bad concept. In fact, it is an essential concept provided it is appropriately applied. I like neither the unfettered rule of the market nor the uncontrolled power of the state. What I have described in my previous answer is, in my mind, resource nationalism gone right. What I see in many countries is resource nationalism gone wrong – opportunistic, economically destructive, politically convenient. In South Africa state capture is exactly that: a pseudo-patriotic discourse that manipulates the public sphere, kidnaps the public purse and enriches a corrupt elite at the expense of everyone else. Show me where that works! You may ‘succeed’ in oil-rich countries like Libya under Gadhafi , or Equatorial Guinea. But in mining countries, not a chance. There, it’s a zero-sum game. The interesting question, for which I have no answer yet, is why have certain countries like Namibia and Botswana managed to establish a benign but at the same time a resource nationalistic framework, and others have not. Why does Zambia keep repeating the same mistakes? And the DRC? Why has South Africa chosen the destructive policy path it has? The key challenges presented by mining are the enormous investments necessary for exploration and development, African Mining  November 2019 In South Africa the ANC has been in government since 1994, and despite this has failed to deliver a stable, predictable policy environment and improving climate for investment and doing business. No sooner has a minister announced a new policy, than he or she will advise that this is temporary, and that more changes are coming, all the while self-congratulating on having delivered stability and quality. Odd… If that worked, we would by now have known. The South African mining industry is in perennial crisis, having gone from world-leading to world-lagging. And policy is a key factor. I will point you to a study we conducted on the matter last year, entitled Mineral Policy Impact on South Africa's Mining. An Economic Analysis. It is available on our website at https:// www.eunomix.com/our-work.php "One does not build a mining industry by cutting investment, production, exports. It just does not happen. Norway is resource nationalistic. Saudi Arabia, UAE are all resource nationalistic. In these countries the proceeds from an abundance of oil and gas are being put to good use to the benefi t of the people. This, for me, is a better system than the North American model where the resource belongs to the company and it can do whatever it wants with it and damn the social and environmental consequences. The philosophy is of course that the benefi ts will trickle down to the masses. I don’t buy that. 60  and then continuous investment during the life-of-mine. This is most likely the main diff erence with oil and gas, which are less capital demanding during exploitation. Evidence tends to point to the fact that countries who get it right understand that without sustained private sector involvement mining investment cannot be maintained. So, mining is a quintessential public-private partnership industry. Governments who get that will get it right. Governments who don’t will come way short, and their countries will more likely become victims of the resource curse. Could it be that countries like Namibia and Botswana get it right because of their small populations? Our Eunomix Geopolitical and Country Risk (GCR) solution ranks all countries in the world on a set of performance indicators: security, governance, economy and society. Interestingly, the smaller African countries – population and/ or size – tend to do better than the large ones. In the club of resource rich countries, you will fi nd Botswana, Namibia and Mauritania. They have small populations. They have an easier time getting consensus and settling key policies. Then there are the island states of Cape Verde, Mauritius and the Seychelles. These are resource-less and have had to use other factors to develop. How important is it for mining and exploration companies to do proper risk assessments and due diligence studies when they venture into Africa? Investors tend to have very strange understanding of and views on Africa, a sort of cognitive dissonance. On the one hand there is that fear, unreasonable and irrational about Africa – a fantasy creation that portrays our continent as dangerous, unstable, unpredictable. But on the other hand, and often by the very same people, there is the belief that Africa has huge economic potential – resources, markets, and what not – that are just waiting to be taken advantage of. This dualism translates into irrational pessimism and exuberance. This leaves rational, fact-based analysis and opportunity/ risk management out of the door. Mostly. Investors go, so to speak, on a wing and a prayer, hoping to be successful, fearing not to be. This is not the way to go. Opportunity must be assessed and managed with a clear eye. And so must risks. On the whole, doing business in Africa is indeed more diffi cult than say Australia or Canada. Proper in-depth due diligence must be conducted: country, region, village, prospective local partners, and the likes. www. africanmining.co.za