AfMA Fleetdrive Issue 20 | Page 21

LOOKING BACK: FLEETDRIVE ISSUE 6 FLEETDRIVE albeit “Some 100 or so years away. “But it is not robots rising up that we need worry about today. It’s incompetence, not malevolence that concerns me and my fellow scientists. We will be giving autonomy, the ability to act and make life or death decisions, to machines that today are rather stupid, unable to distinguish between combatant and civilian, to act proportionally as required by IHL.” But, the question begging is, where are we headed right now? Our faces and focus are buried in our devices, so how will we ever recognise a cybernetic organism or autonomous malicious drone if it gets that bad? “The technology we work on is morally neutral, it leads to good or bad outcomes, and we get to choose which path we follow,” Walsh reassures. “Unfortunately history suggests we often end up following a less desirable path like the nuclear arms race. But every now and again we come together as a society and make a good decision like the arms treaties on chemical and biological weapons, blinding lasers, and cluster munitions.” While these examples have not been full proof, Walsh reinforces how much better off we all are. That said, being better off is usually subjective, especially when automation clashes with human function. “The worst case is not likely robots take over, but many of us being made redundant – computers replacing many jobs, the rich getting richer,” he said. “Trump and Brexit are just the tip of an approaching iceberg – we need to worry about these issues today.” Fortunately these kinds of concerns are already being taken seriously by the UN, which Walsh says is a good sign. “The UN unanimously decided in December to move to the next step towards a possible ban [on autonomous weapons], forming a Group of Governmental Experts to discuss the issue of a possible ban formally,” he said. Although not everybody is on board, or even in touch with the issue. Above: A Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (2003) ‘Hunter Killer’ (left) vs the US military’s actual ‘Predator’ drone (right). Both lethal, and autonomous. ISSUE 20 2019 / WWW.AFMA.ORG.AU 21