Advertising Standards Bureau - Review of Operations 2013 | Page 34

Exploitative & degrading (Section 2.2, AANA Code of Ethics) Section 2.2 of the Code concerning the use of sexual appeal in a manner which is exploitative and degrading was introduced in 2012. This section takes into account the objectification of children, men and women and requires that the advertisement use sexual appeal in a manner that is exploitative and degrading. Common complaints under Section 2.2 of the Code surround imagery of women’s bodies omitting their head implying they are sexual objects, and concerns over relevance images may have to the product or service advertised. Although the majority of complaints in this section surround the portrayal of women, the Code applies to images of women, men and children. Children Women The AANA Code of Ethics Practice Note provides the following additional guidelines for advertisers regarding exploitative and degrading content concerning children; in advertisements where images of children are used, sexual appeal is not acceptable and will always be regarded as exploitative and degrading. In 2013 the Board did not find any advertisements in breach of Section 2.2 in relation to images of children and very few complaints raised this issue. Images which breached Code Concerns of exploitative and degrading imagery of children were raised with a lingerie advertisement for Bonds (0177/13) which featured a girl skipping in underwear with the underwear design changing with each skip of the rope. Complaints expressed concern over the model’s age particularly with her hair in plaits and engaging in a childlike activity; skipping. The majority of the Board determined that the model looked like a young woman engaging in a youthful, fun and energetic activity but it was not sexual or suggestive. The Board found that this advertisement was not exploitative and degrading to children. Another advertisement which attracted complaints concerning children in Section 2.2 featured adults with superimposed baby heads (Vodafone – 0338/13). In a particular scene, three adult women with superimposed baby heads walk down a street dancing which raised concerns over the sexualisation of children. The Board’s view was that the children were not presented as sexual beings or having sexual appeal, and dismissed complaints. Men In 2013 there were no cases considered by the Board concerning exploitative and degrading imagery of men. Complaints regarding discrimination or vilification of men are captured under Section 2.1 of the Code and the use of sex, sexuality and nudity is considered under Section 2.4. 32 The Board has found several advertisements in breach of Section 2.2 of the Code for the use of sexual appeal in a manner which is exploitative and degrading to women. An advertisement for Tremonti Jewellery (0030/13) featured overhead shots of three pairs of women’s legs. At the beginning of the advertisement, the women’s legs are crossed and the women are then presented with a jewellery box. When the closed jewellery box is presented, the women’s legs remain crossed. A second box is presented and is open with jewellery inside and this time the women uncross and spread their legs. The voiceover says Tremonti, always gets you what you want. The Board considered that the image depicts the women in a position that is sexually suggestive as their legs are uncrossed only upon seeing the contents of the jewellery box. The Board also considered that the image depicts the women as objects, without heads or faces, which increased the suggestion that the women have no value other than their bodies. The Board considered that the representation of the women as simply pairs of legs was irrelevant to the service advertised, a jewellery store. The parting of their legs only upon the revealing of jewellery was considered degrading. The Board considered that the impact of the advertisement as a whole is exploitative of women and is also degrading, which breached Section 2.2 of the Code. A case which breached both Section 2.2 and 2.4 in 2013 featured a woman lying on the beach with the contents of a burger including lettuce, tomato, cheese and a meat patty were between the cheeks of her backside (Good Time Burgers - 0416/13). The text in the advertisement stated the freshest fun between the buns. The Board considered that although the advertiser intended the image to be a humorous depiction, the close up image of the woman’s bottom and the portrayal of her bottom as a burger likened the woman to a piece of meat or object for consumption and objectified women. The Board also considered that this depiction of a woman as a burger is exploitative of women and degrading. Advertising Standards Bureau