Acta Dermato-Venereologica 97-6 97-6CompleteContent | Page 18
739
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Expression of Histidine Decarboxylase in the Epidermis of Primates with Chronic Itch
Yoshihiro INAMI 1,2 , Leigh Ann NATTKEMPER 1 , Kent SAKAI 1 , Gil YOSIPOVITCH 1 and Tasuku AKIYAMA 1,3 *
1
Department of Dermatology and Temple Itch Center and 3 Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Temple University School of Medicine,
3500 North Broad Street, Medical Education and Research Building 452, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA, and 2 Hoyu Co., Ltd., Fundamental
Research Laboratory, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan. *E-mail: [email protected]
Accepted Nov 2, 2016; Epub ahead of print Nov 2, 2016
Chronic itch is a burdensome clinical issue that has a
significant negative impact on quality of life. In the past
two decades, the volume of research on itch has increased
immensely. However, there is still a significant lack of
translation from scientific findings into medical practice.
We previously identified a colony of Cynomolgus ma-
caques (Macaca fascicularis) suffering from idiopathic
chronic itch (1). This non-human primate chronic itch
model could provide a translational bridge for studying
chronic itch.
Histidine decarboxylase (HDC) is the enzyme that
catalyzes the synthesis of histamine. Recently, an in-
crease in epidermal HDC was shown in acute and chronic
itch-related behaviors induced by topical application of
anionic surfactants in mice (2, 3). Additionally, epidermal
HDC is elevated in mice with α-melanocyte-stimulating
hormone-induced itch (4). Thus, these findings suggest
that increased HDC in the epidermis might play a role
in itch. In the present study, we investigated whether
epidermal HDC is associated with itch severity in the
primate model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The skin of adult female Cynomolgus macaques (n = 8; Macaca
fascicularis) suffering from varying degrees of idiopathic chronic
itch was used. These primates had no inflammatory skin lesions
or infections (e.g. mites), nor received any antipruritic therapy.
Behavior was observed in 10-min sessions, at similar times during
the day (early afternoon), twice weekly for a 4-year period by
two trained observers. The frequency of scratch bouts (number of
scratching episodes per focal observation) was documented using
a validated focal animal observation technique (5; described in
detail in 1). A single bout of scratching was defined as moving
the fingertips repeatedly across the same skin area for duration
longer than one second and is distinct from grooming behaviors.
The frequencies recorded over the 4 years were then averaged for
each primate, thus representing a total of 68 h of observation per
animal. Skin tissue was then collected and fixed in 4% parafor-
maldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) over night
at 4ºC, and embedded in paraffin.
For immunohistochemical analysis, the paraffin-embedded skin
was sectioned at a 5-μm thickness. After dewaxing and antigen
retrieval using DAKO Target Retrieval Solution (S1699; DAKO
Corporation, Carpinteria, CA) overnight at 60ºC, sections were
blocked in PBS containing 0.2% Triton X-100 and 5% donkey
serum (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove,
PA) at room temperature for 2 h. The following primary antibodies
were then incubated over night at 4ºC: rabbit polyclonal anti-HDC
antibody (1:100; HPA038891, Atlas antibodies Co., Stockholm,
Sweden) or mouse polyclonal anti-cytokeratin 10 antibody (1:100;
ab9026, Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA). After washing with PBS,
the sections were incubated for 2 h at room temperature with the
corresponding secondary antibodies conjugated to either Alexa
Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 594 (1:300; Invitrogen Co., Carlsbad,
CA). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (4,6-diamidino-
2-phenylindole). Specificity of the anti-HDC antibody was
confirmed by preabsorption of antibody with the immunogenic
peptide (1:100; APrEST70111, Atlas Antibodies, Stockholm,
Sweden). Immunofluorescence was visualized using a fluorescence
microscope (E1000; Nicon Eclipse, Tokyo, Japan) and 7 images
(field size per image: 526.7 × 703.5 µm) were randomly selected
from each primate to be captured under 20× magnification. For
immunoreactivity quantitation, signal intensity in the epidermis
was determined for each image after background subtraction using
Image J software (NIH, Bethesda, MD). Correlation between
primate scratching behavior and immunoreactivity was preformed
using Spearman correlation analysis with a probability of p < 0.05
considered to be significant (SPSS Statistics).
RESULTS
HDC immunoreactivity was exclusively detected in the
primate epidermis (Fig. 1A). This immunoreactivity was
completely abolished by preabsorption of the antibody
Fig. 1. Positive correlation between epidermal HDC expression and itch severity in primates. (A) A typical example of expression of histidine
decarboxylase (HDC; green) in the skin of primates with chronic itch. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). A white dashed line indicates the border
between epidermis and dermis. 20× magnification. Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) As in A for preabsorption test. HDC expression was abolished by preabsorption
of the blocking peptide. (C) As in A for the skin of a primate showing the lowest scratch number in the colony. HDC expression was barely detected. (D)
The expression level of HDC in the epidermis correlated with the frequency of scratch bouts in 10-min session (Spearman correlation, r=0.750, p = 0.02).
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license. www.medicaljournals.se/acta
Journal Compilation © 2017 Acta Dermato-Venereologica.
doi: 10.2340/00015555-2559
Acta Derm Venereol 2017; 97: 739–740