Acrede Accolade October 2013 Oct. 2013 | Page 2

Jumping the gun on EU data protection Europe’s data protection regime is now nearly 20 years old, predating the cloud, social media and smartphones. W • It requires businesses to notify data security breaches to their local data protection authority within 24 hours but a committee of the European Parliament suggests that it should be 72 hours. It is fairly well known that changes are afoot to the existing Data Protection Directive and the UK’s associated Act. The changes currently being proposed would affect all businesses, great and small, and we are frequently asked what they should be doing to prepare. However, it will be some time before an agreement is made, and then even longer until the new regulations are implemented into UK law. • The draft suggests that the new rules should apply to data on EU citizens processed anywhere in the world, but the ICO questions how this could possibly be enforced. hen the current law was passed, I was just getting the hang of surfing the web with Netscape Navigator and was about to be granted my very own email address at university, accessed through Pine. Suffice to say that the current regime is looking more than a little out of date. Pistols at dawn Data protection is a contentious issue in the European Parliament, with MEPs disagreeing over more than they agree. The European Council has proposed three thousand amendments to the 95-page draft prepared by the European Commission - and it’s only just beginning to sink its teeth into the detail. A number of major issues have been raised about the draft regulation that are yet to be resolved, for instance: Original story found here: http://www.computing.co.uk/ ctg/opinion/2285394/jumpingthe-gun-on-eu-data-protection/ page/1 2 • It places a significantly greater burden on data controllers to make sure that their processes are compliant. The UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has complained that the suggested new rules in this area are too prescriptive. Accolade OCTOBER 2013 • The draft gives data subjects the ‘right to be forgotten’, for example on social networking sites, but nobody seems to understand how this would work in practice. The ICO is also getting worried about how his office will fund the significantly more rigorous regulation if it isn’t allowed to charge data controllers for their annual registration renewals. Will the European Council really pass a law that requires governments to increase taxes to pay for an expanded role for an EU-mandated non-departmental public body? Given all of this uncertainty, what should UK businesses do now? First, they should get their houses in order under the existing regime. It may be 20 years old, but many of the existing principles look to be here to stay. Complying with the current regime is a good stepping-stone to compliance with whatever replaces it - and in my experience, few businesses can afford to be complacent about their existing processes. BANG!