aBr May 2014 | Page 58

right to repair As mentioned in our previous Right to Repair articles, there are many intriguing aspects that underlie this debate, and we now give you part three, the final part of a series of articles written by Andrew D. Graham, managing director of SUPLEX GmbH, about the perceptions of quality, and how these perceptions are formed. This series has been extracted from a letter Andrew wrote to Peter Lawton, editor of CAT Magazine, one of the UK’s leading automotive aftermarket trade publications. A Moral and Legal Obligation And because the vast majority of parts offered in the UK aftermarket are described as “matching quality parts”, price has become the primary differentiator instead of the quality of the part itself. In this respect, OESAA’s drive to force aftermarket suppliers to describe all parts correctly is to be both commended and applauded. It is, as we have seen, far too easy for others to find fault with any new initiative and I am sure there will be plenty who will find fault with the initiative I have described here. No matter, we’re ready to listen to criticism, ready to ride the ensuing storm. The coil-springs fitted to the current generation of passenger cars are often sophisticated designs and many cannot be satisfactorily reproduced by some aftermarket suppliers. Quite often, they redesign the spring to make it fit their manufacturing plant and in doing so change the spring characteristics. The curved, side-load spring is only one example. D esigned to reduce friction between the shock absorber piston rod and its seal, many aftermarket suppliers offer instead a parallel design, the only benefit of which is to the mechanic, because a parallel spring is easier to fit! Car owners should not be surprised when they experience a harsher ride after such springs have been fitted, especially at low speed. Sometimes we forget what the independent aftermarket is about: it is our job to make cars better, not worse. This brings me to an aspect of our business which is often overlooked and that is our moral and, as managing directors and owners of our businesses, our legal obligation to correctly describe and represent the products we are introducing to and promoting in the market. The UK market, quite frankly, is awash with poor quality coil-springs that are being promoted as matching quality parts. This is often a well- known fact amongst those promoting them and the supplier’s matching quality certificate provides the comforting sense of security they need to justify their actions: the mask, if worn long enough, becomes the face. ➲ The taper wire Miniblock Spring for the GM “Epsilon” platform (Opel Vectra C). Epsilon is General Motors’ mid-size front-wheel drive automobile platform. The architecture was developed by Opel, and debuted in the 2002 Opel Vectra and 2003 Saab 9-3. Since this platform falls squarely in the centre of the worldwide automobile market, GM produced a great many Epsilon vehicles with over a dozen variations. As of 2005, it is GM’s highest volume worldwide platform. Even after the dissolution of the GM/Fiat partnership, both companies retain the rights to continue developing Epsilon-derived models. On the left: the taper wire design supplied by SUPLEX to their clients. In the middle: the taper wire Original Equipment design fitted at the factory. On the right: a constant wire, “matching quality” aftermarket replacement part for the same application. Note the much shorter free length. This free length issue causes much head-scratching in the workshop. | words in action 56 may 2014 The horsemeat scandal really has sounded the death knell for self-certification and our industry, our customers, surely deserve something better. Let’s offer it to them. As George Bernard Shaw once said, “Making a start is half the work.” You’ll be pleased to learn we’ve progressed well past the halfway mark. Any c oil-spring manufacturers or suppliers interested in learning more about our initiative are welcome to contact Andrew D. Graham at e-mail [email protected] or tel. +49 171 459 0221. In the next issue of aBr, we will have a look at how Suplex educates the market to identify the differences in products offered.