21st. CENTURY EDUCATION-"TEACHERS OUT, LEARNERS IN" TEACHERS OUT LEARNERS IN BOOKLET | Page 113

113
REferences

 https://facultyinnovate.utexas.edu/teaching/prepare/futureinstructors/activities/interactive
(1) Hackman, M. Z., Walker, K. B. (1990). Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The
effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication
Education, 39, 196-206.
 (2) Buskist, W., & Saville, B. K. (2001). Rapport-building: Creating positive emotional contexts for enhancing
teaching and learning, APS Observer, 13(3) N/A.
 (3) Hess, J. A., & Smythe, M.J. (2001). Is teacher immediacy actually related to student cognitive learning?
Communication Studies, 52, 197-219.
 (4) Christophel, D., & Gorham, J. (1995). A test-retest analysis of student motivation, teacher immediacy, and
perceived sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication Education, 44, 292-
306.
 (5) Frymier, A. B. (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42, 133-144
 (6) Rodriguez, J., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1996). Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal
immediacy and student cognitive learning: Affective learning as the central causal mediator.
Communication Education, 45, 293-305.
 (7) Gorham, J., & Millette, D. M. (1997). A comparative analysis of teacher and student perceptions of sources
of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication Education, 46, 245-261.
 (8) Crosnoe, R., Elder Jr., G.H., & Johnson, M.K. (2004). Intergenerational bonding in school: The behavioral
and contextual correlates of student-teacher relationships. Sociology of Education, 77(1), 60-81.
http://www.teachthought.com/learning/10-pros-cons-flipped-classroom/
