1.1.2 LEARNING OBJECTIVE : The st udent w ill becom e fam iliar w it h Suprem e Court decisions and ot her court decisions involving appropriat e act ions in t raffic st ops .
A . Whren v . Unit ed St at es , 517 U . S . 806 , 116 S . Ct . 1769 ( 1996 ) 1 . Motor vehicle search exemption 2 . Traffic violation acceptable as pretext for further investigation 3 . Selective enforcement can be challenged
B . Terry v . Ohio , 392 U . S . 1 , 88 S . Ct . 1868 ( 1968 ) 1 . Stop & Frisk doctrine 2 . Stopping and briefly detaining a person 3 . Frisk and pat down
C . Ot her cases 1 . Pennsylvania v . Mimms , 434 U . S . 106 , 98 S . Ct . 330 ( 1977 ) 2 . Maryland v . Wilson , 117 S . Ct . 882 ( 1997 ) 3 . Graham v . State , 119 MdApp 444 , 705 A . 2d 82 ( 1998 ) 4 . Pryor v . State , 122 Md . App . 671 ( 1997 ) cert . denied 352 Md . 312 , 721 A . 2d 990 ( 1998 ) 5 . Ferris v . State , 355 Md . 356 , 735 A . 2d 491 ( 1999 ) 6 . New York v . Belton , 453 U . S . 454 ( 1981 )
7