13th European Conference on eGovernment – ECEG 2013 1 | Page 84

Juan Carlos Barahona and Andrey Elizondo
Gartner Group.“ Key issues in e‐Government strategy and management.” Research Notes, Key Issues, May 2000. Hatcher, L. A step‐by‐step approach to using the SAS( R) system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. NC:
SAS Institute, 1994. Henman, Paul. « Government and the Internet: Evolving Technologies, Enduring Research Themes.» En The Oxford
Handbook of Internet Studies, de William H. Dutton. Oxford University Press, 2013. Holzer, Marc, and Seang‐Tae Kim. Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide: An Assessment of Municipal Web Sites Throughout the World. The E‐Governance Institute / National Center for Public Productivity Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Global e‐Policy e‐Government Institute Sungkyunkwan University, 2003.
Ifinedo, Princely.“ Drivers of E‐Government Maturity in Two Developing Regions: Focus on Latin America And Sub‐Saharan Africa.” JISTEM ‐ Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management 9, no. 1( 2012): 05‐22.
INCAE. Evaluación de la calidad de la prestación de servicios públicos por medios digitales en Costa Rica 2010. INCAE Business School, Alajuela, Costa Rica: INCAE Business School, 2010.
INCAE. Evaluación de la calidad de la prestación de servicios públicos por medios digitales en Costa Rica 2011. INCAE Business School, Alajuela, Costa Rica: INCAE Business School, 2011.
INCAE. Evaluación de la calidad de servicios públicos por medios digitales en Costa Rica 2012. Alajuela, Costa Rica: INCAE Business School, 2012.
Iribarren, Marcelo, et al. Capability Maturity Framework for e‐Government: A Multi‐dimensional Model and Assessing Tool. Government of Chile and the Inter‐American Development Bank, 2008.
Kunstelj, Mateja, and Mirko Vintar.“ Evaluating the progress of e‐Government development: A critical analysis.” Information Polity, 2004: 131 – 148.
Laynea, Karen, and Jungwoo Leeb.“ Developing fully functional E‐Government: A four stage model.” Government
Information Quarterly( Elsevier) 18( 2001): 122 – 136. Margetts, Hellen Z. " The Internet and Public Policy." Policy & Internet 1, no. 1( 2009). Middleton, Michael.“ Approaches of Evaluation of Websites for Public Sector Services.” Proceedings of the IADIS
International Conference, e‐Society 2007( IADIS), 2007: 279‐284. Mundy, Darren, and Bandi Musa.“ Towards a Framework for eGovernment Development in Nigeria.” Electronic Journal of e‐Government 8, no. 2( 2010): 148‐161. OECD. The e‐Goverment imperative. e‐Government Studies, OECD, OECD Publications Service, 2003. OECD, Dubai School of Government.“ Measuring and Evaluating E‐Government in Arab Countries.” High Level Seminar on Measuring and Evaluating E‐Government and 3rd Meeting of Working Group 2 on E‐Government and Administrative Simplification. Dubai, 2007. 12‐13 March.
Peters, Rob M., Marijn Janssen, and Tom M. Engers.“ Measuring e‐Government Impact: Existing practices and shortcomings.” ICEC ' 04, Sixth International Conference on Electronic Commerce. 2004.
Stanimirovic, Dalibor, Anamarija Leben, and Tina Jukic.“ Conceptualization of an integrated indicator model for evaluation of e‐Government policies.” 2011.
Tobias, Escher, and Margetts Hellen.“ Understanding governments and citizens on‐line: Learning for e‐commerce.”( Oxford University Institute) 2007.
Tolbert, Caroline J., and Karen Mossberger.“ The Effects of E‐Government on Trust and Confidence in Government.” 2006 йил May ‐ June. Torres, Norberto Antonio. Análise do Desenvolvimento do Governo Eletrônico. Sao Paulo: TecGov / FGV, 2006. UN. E‐Government Survey 2012. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2012. Universidad de San Andrés.“ Análisis de páginas web municipales en Argentina.” Cátedra Software AG – Alianza Sumaq en eGovernment, 2006. Vaclav, Petricek, Tobias Escher, Cox J. Ingemar, and Margetts Helen. The Web Structure of E‐Government ‐ Developing a
Methodology for Quantitative Evaluation. Oxford UK: Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford University, 2006.
62