13th European Conference on eGovernment – ECEG 2013 1 | Page 473

Alberto Savoldelli, Gianluca Misuraca and Cristiano Codagnone
Capgemini,( 2004). Digitizing Public Service In Europe: Putting Ambition into Action, 9th Benchmark Measurement,( 2010). Delivered for the European Commission, DG Information Society: Brussels, available online at: http:// ec. europa. eu / information _ society / newsroom / cf / document. cfm? action = display & doc _ id = 747
Capgemini,( 2010). Digitizing Public Service In Europe: Putting Ambition into Action, 9th Benchmark Measurement,( 2010). Delivered for the European Commission, DG Information Society: Brussels.
Carbo, T., & Williams, J., G.,( 2004).“ Models and metrics for evaluating local electronic government system and services”. In Electronic Journal of e‐Government. 2( 2), pp: 94‐104.
Carbone, C.( 2012). La valutazione dei Progetti ICT: il caso del PITER 2011‐2013. Paper presented in the“ Bologna Smart City workshop ‐ SmartER”, October, Bologna.
Castelnovo, W.( 2010). Is there an eGovernment Paradox? In D. O’ Donnel( Ed.), 10th European eGovernment Conference on eGovernment( pp. 90‐98). Limerick, Ireland: Academic Publishing.
Codagnone, C., Caldarelli, L., Cilli, V., Galasso, G. & Zanchi, F.( 2006). Compendium to the Measurement Framework, eGEP Project. DG Information Society, Brussels. [ online ] Available at http: http:// 82.187.13.175 / egep / asp / E _ Home. asp.
Codagnone, C., & Undheim, T.,( 2008).“ Government Efficiency and Effectiveness: The Theory and Practice of Evaluation and Measurment”. In European Journal of ePractice. 1( 4), pp: 1‐15.
Dawes, S., S.,( 2008). An Exploratory Framework for Future eGovernment Research Investments. Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science.
Danish Digital Task Force,( 2004) The Danish eGovernment Strategy 2004‐2006: Realising The Vision, DTF, Copenhagen, http:// e. gov. dk / uploads / media / strategy _ 2004 _ 06 _ en _ 01. doc.
DFP,( 2012). Dipartment of Finance and Personnel. The Gateway Review Process. Available at: http:// www. dfpni. gov. uk / gateway‐review‐process
Ebrahim, Z., Irani, Z.,( 2005).“ eGovernmnet adoption: architecture and barriers”. In Business Process Management Journal, 11( 5), p: 589‐611.
Esteves, J., Rhoda, C. J.,( 2008). " A comprehensive framework for the assessment of eGovernmnet projects ". In Government Information Quarterly, 25, pp: 118 ‐132.
EUPractices,( 2007), European eGovernment 2005‐2007: taking stock of goods practices and progress towards implementation of the i2010 eGovernment Action Plan. European Commission Report, DG Information Society and Media.
European Commission,( 2005).“ i2010 – A European Information Society for growth and employment”. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.
European Council,( 2010). European Council conclusion on Europe 2020 strategy inclusive Digital Agenda. Conclusion of the European Council.
Foley, K.,( 2006). Using the value measuring methodology to evaluate government initiatives. Proceedings of the 2006
Crystal Ball User Conference. May 1‐3. Denver. Colorado. Freed, L.,( 2009). eGovernment Satisfaction Index. ForeSee Results periodical publication. Garbarino, S., & Holland, J.,( 2009), Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Impact Evaluation and Measuring Results.
Issue Paper commissioned by the UK Department for International Defelopment. Gasparotos, A., EL‐Haram, M., & Horner, M.,( 2008).“ A critical review of reductionist appraches for assessing progress towards sustainability”. In Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 28( 2008), p: 286‐311. Gil‐Garcia, J., R., & Pardo, T., A.,( 2005).“ eGovernment success factors: mapping practical tool to theoretical foundations”.
In Government Information Quarterly, 22( 2), pp: 187‐216. Hargraves, M., B.,( 2010), Evaluating System Change: A Planning Guide. Mathematica Policy Research Inc. Heeks, R.,( 2006). Understanding and Measuring eGovernment: International Benchmarking Studies. Paper prepared for UNDESA workshop on“ eParticipation and eGovernment: Understanding the Present and Creating the Future”. 27‐28 July, Budapest, Hungary.
Heeks R., Molla A.,( 2009), Impact assessment of ICT development projects: a compendium of approaches, Manchester University Institute for development policy and management, Ed. Development Informatics Group.
Johnsen, A.,( 2004), The politics of performances measurement: what does 25 yrs of experiences tell us about the state of performance measurement in public management, European Group of Public Administration Conference, Lublijana.
Kahraman, C., Demirel, N. C., and Demirel, T.( 2007)‘ Prioritization of e‐Government strategies using a SWOT‐AHP analysis: the case of Turkey’, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 284‐298.
Kolsker, A., & Lee‐Kelley, L.,( 2008).“ Citizens’ attitudes towards eGovernment and eGovernance: a UK study”. In International Journal of Public Sector Management. 21( 7), pp: 723‐738.
Kunstelj, M., & Vintar, M.,( 2004).“ Evaluating the progress of eGovernmnet development: A critical analysis”. In Information Policy, 9( 3‐4). pp: 131‐148.
Lindquist, E. A. 2006,‘ Organising for policy implementation: the emergence and role of Implementation Units in policy design and oversight’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, Vol 8, No. 4, December, p 421. Mansar, S.( 2006), E‐Government Implementation: Impact on Business Processes, IEEE, pp. 1‐5. Misuraca G. and Rossel, P.,( 2011). Reflexivity, modelling and weak signals of transformational tracks to support both micro‐ and macro‐measuring of Information society services. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance( ICEGOV2011), Tallinn, Estonia, 26‐28 September 2011 ‐ ACM International Conference Proceedings Series, ACM Press.
451