Alexopoulos Charalampos et al.
Davis, F. D.( 1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13( 3), pp. 319‐339.
DeLone, D. H., McLean, E. R.( 1992),“ Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable”. Information Systems Research, 3( 1), pp. 60‐95
DeLone, D. H., McLean, E. R.( 2003),“ The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten‐year update”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 4,, 9 – 30
DIRECTIVE 2003 / 98 / EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 17 November 2003 on the re‐use of public sector information, 31 / 12 / 2003, Official Journal of the European Union, available at: http:// ec. europa. eu / information _ society / policy / psi / docs / pdfs / directive / psi _ directive _ en. pdf European _ Commission.( 2011). Digital agenda: Turning government data into gold. Brussels: European _ Commission. Farbey, B., Land, F., and Targett, D.( 1999),“ Moving IS evaluation forward: learning themes and research issues. The
Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8( 2), 189 – 207 Fassnacht, M., and Koese, I.( 2006),“ Quality of electronic services”, Journal of Service Research, 9( 1), 19 – 37 Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I.( 1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior. Reading, MA: Addison‐Wesley Gunasekaran, A., Ngai, E. W. T., and McGaughey( 2006),“, Information technology and systems justification: a review for research and applications”. European Journal of Operational Research, 173, 957 – 983. Hirschheim, R., and Smithson, S.( 1988),“ A critical analysis of information systems evaluation. In N. Bjorn‐Andersen and G. Davis( eds.), Information Systems Assessment: Issues and Challenges, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1988, 17 – 37 Irani, Z.( 2002),“ Information systems evaluation: navigating through the problem domain”. Information and Management,
40, 1, 11 – 24 Irani, Z., and Love, P.,( 2008),“ Information systems evaluation – a crisis of understanding” In Z. Irani and P. Love( eds.),
“ Evaluating Information Systems – Public and Private Sector”, Butterworth‐Heinemann, UK Irani, Z., Gunasekaran, A., and Love, E. D.( 2006),“ Quantitative approaches to information systems evaluation”, European
Journal of Operational Research, 173, 951 – 956 Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A.( 2012).“ Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open
Government”, Information Systems Management, 29, 258 – 268. Loukis, E. Pazalos, K. Salagara, A.( 2012),“ Transforming e‐services evaluation data into business analytics using value models”, Elsevier, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 11( 2012), 129 – 141 Lu, J., and Zhang, G.( 2003),“ Cost benefit factor analysis in e‐services”, International Journal of Industry Service
Management, 14, 5, 570 – 595 Meijer, A., & Thaens, M.( 2009). Public information strategies: Making government information available to citizens.
Information Polity 14, 31 – 45 Neumann, F.( 2002).‘ Formative vs. summative Evaluation’, Seminar Thesis, University of Erlangen, 2002 OECD( 1998).’ Best Practice Guidelines for Evaluation’. PUMA Policy Brief No. 5, May 1998. Available at: http:// www. oecd. org / dataoecd / 11 / 56 / 1902965. pdf Open Data: Where to begin? Issy‐les‐Moulineaux, France, 5 October, 2012 Papadakis, I., & Kyprianos, K.( 2012). Providing LOD‐Based Functionality in Digital Libraries. Paper presented at the 6th
Research Conference on Metadata and Semantics Research( MTSR 2012), Cadiz, Spain Rowley, J.( 2006),‘ An analysis of the e‐service literature: towards a research agenda’. Internet Research, 16, 3, 2006, 339 –
359. Saha, R., Grover, S.( 2011),“ Quantitative Evaluation of Website Quality Dimension for Web 2.0”, International Journal of u‐ and e‐ Service, Science and Technology, 4( 4), 15‐36. Schepers, J. and Wetzels, M.( 2007). A meta‐analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44, pp. 90‐103 Seddon, P. B.( 1997),“ A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success“. Information
Systems Research, 8( 3), 240 – 253. Smithson, S., and Hirscheim, R.( 1998),“ Analysing information systems evaluation: another look at an old problem.
European Journal of Information Systems, 7, 158 – 174 Stockdale, R., and Standing, C.( 2006),“ An interpretive approach for interpreting information systems: a content, context, process framework”. European Journal of Operational Research, 173,, 1090 – 1102. Sumak, B., Polancic, G., and Hericko, M.( 2009),“ Towards an e‐service knowledge system for improving the quality and adoption of e‐services”, In Proceedings of the 22nd Bled‘ eEnablement: Facilitating an Open, Effective and Representative Society’, June 14 – 17, 2009, Bled, Slovenia
Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D.( 2000),“ A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 45( 2), 186 – 204.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D.( 2003)“ User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view”, MIS Quarterly, 27, 3, 2003, 425 – 478 Willcocks, L.( 1996),“ Investing in Information Systems: Evaluation and Management”. Chapman & Hall, London. Willcocks, L., and Graeser, V.( 2001),“ Delivering IT and E‐business Value. Butterworth – Heinemann, Boston, MA Wixom, B. H., Todd, P. A.( 2005),“ A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance”, Information
Systems Research, 16( 1), pp. 85‐102. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Choenni, S., Meijer, R., & Sheikh _ Alibaks, R.( 2012).“ Socio‐technical impediments of open data,
Electronic Journal of eGovernment”, 10( 2), 156 ‐ 172.
110