110% MAGAZINE ~ winter 2014 (issue 16) | Page 11

Term Limits for Federal Judges Jamal Greene is a professor of law at Columbia Law School and a former clerk for Justice John Paul Stevens. It has become common, even this soon, to describe the health care decision as being central to Chief Justice John Roberts’s legacy at the Supreme Court. But that assessment may be premature. If the chief justice were to retire at the same age as the justice I clerked for, John Paul Stevens, he would be on the court until the year 2045. Will we — those of us still around, that is — even remember the health care decision then? The drafters of the 1787 Constitution had good reasons for giving life tenure to federal judges -- reasons that are not valid today. In a democracy, no one person should wield so much power for so long. Article III of the Constitution provides that federal judges “shall hold their offices during good behavior.” In practice this language means they serve for life absent voluntary retirement or impeachment. Were we to draft the Constitution today, we would be wise to reconsider this provision. 11